It’s a good policy because otherwise the earth will be destroys. Some chinese will go out just to find a food and no one can afford for life, education and etc.

There’s always pros & cons about the policy. Chinese culture is rule by man. So, if a couple discover the baby (fetus) inside is female….a lots of them will do abortion & try again until they get a male. It’ll cause the social problems.

 There’s no RIGHT or WRONG about this policy. Just what works and what doesn’t.

Listen Kim, Tibet belongs to China. The lama destroy the public buildings and why the China got the blame?

Do you guys want China to become like Soviet Union in 1990?

Explain to me about Iraq…Does USA really take democracy to Iraq?

(Wow Nadiana, you’ve struck your first chord with me. I guessed this website would be an interesting project. Now I break my rules on talking about politics and reply.)

You may find it interesting that the word “Tibet” is likely derived from an Arabic word which means “the heights”. Tibet is often referred to as the “Roof of the World.”

As far as earning their right to independence through war; I know that in 1949 a Chinese army twenty times larger than Tibet’s forced them into signing an agreement but Tibet is not China.

The Tibetan language split from Chinese over 6,000 years ago.
Tibet and China signed a peace treaty around 1,200 years ago and remained a Central Asian empire for a thousand years. It probably wasn’t until the British invaded Tibet in early 1900′s that things really got messed up and allowed China authorities suzerainty over the internally autonomous state!
The last one hundred years has seen intense dispute regarding Tibet.
If I remember correctly it was about the same time in history that what is now named Malaysia was calling on the British for strength to unify into states who later had the Japanese to thank for invading and shaking off the consequential British control just enough so they could claim Independence.
Who’s going to help Tibet today, India? (sorry, I don’t mean to joke.)

One in five people is a resident of China. That means collectively they have more human power than each country and could win without weapons, just by sitting on their enemy. They can walk all over you. That would be a ridiculous mess, all those people walking all over each country. Hmm.. isn’t that what’s happening anyway?

Always, fighting, fighting, fighting. Everybody likes to fight.

Should we, as observers, be questioning China’s intentions? Are they actively establishing equal rights and developing Tibet’s infrastructure. Are they developing communities with schools and hospitals and better conditions for all, while allowing unmitigated freedom to embrace Tibetan culture? This isn’t 1952 and I really doubt there is are any goodwill intentions.

~~~

About Kim:

I am not a political person. I do not study politics and I do not like to discuss them. I am a spiritual person, much more than an intellectual. Matters of the Government are not my domain, although I do possess natural leadership abilities.

When I was younger my real spiritual development began with a walk into a bookstore in Philadelphia with no idea which book to choose. I bought my first ‘spiritual’ book on the subject of Chakras. That book on Chakras changed my life and I immediately departed on a new path of study. I moved to California and enrolled in San Francisco State University where I first studied the language Sanskrit. I began to read the oldest writings, attend spiritual gatherings, teachings, schools, temples… anything and anyone who could give me insight.

I don’t know where I am going with these thoughts, except to tell you that I never joined any particular faith, group or viewpoint. Many different practices I have learned. During my ‘spiritual’ enrichment some of the highlights are the few times that I was able to be in the presence of the Dalai Lhama. I have heared him speak and answer questions. I really like the way he talks. He is one of the most reasonable speakers in my experience and I appreciate his ability to intellectualize ideas mundane to monastic.

I will share with you something deeply personal and the only thing I can think of when I hear all this Tibet talk. Over the course of my years I have had plenty of opportunities when someone would be inclined to call out to a higher power.
Some people believe that angels protect them. Some people believe in reincarnation and past lives. I don’t know words to describe more than to say I have a “feeling” that someone watches over me. Every time I have really screwed up my life and I am desolate, miserable and depressed, I hear these three old friends laughing at me. I am not joking. The feeling comes to me that I have several friends sitting in the Himalayas watching me. I am here on my life.. for whatever reason that is… doing my time as part of our experiment here… and they are watching me. Times when I am destroyed by attachment to the world, like a broken heart, are very funny to these imaginary ‘ancients’. Anyway if I could describe them: I have always thought of them as Chinese and call them Mongolians. Since I’m revealing this really weird thought of mine I want to tell you that I don’t actively think of such characters nor have I engaged in conversations in my head with them. It is simply my belief as to who my angels are. Time passes and some solely observe.
I have climbed several tall mountains and every summit I reach is only a glimpse into my history and my spiritual world of Tibet.

Is it the Muslim in you that discredits the Tibetan Buddhists? What should they matter to me, raised Christian? I sometimes feel if I didn’t have a daughter, I might go to the Himalayas to live my life as a monk. I think the truth is kept secret in the highest mountains. Tibetans are keepers of “the heights”.

Theirs is not my battle, but I choose to honor and stand by Tibet. Free Tibet. It will allow China to focus on the 1.3 billion they already have. What’s another 3 million people to such a mass?

Here are other topics I want to talk about:

• One Child Policy.
• CIA in tibet 1972
• chakras
• plastic crap and other Chinese influence
• The 9th sultan of Kedah, Maharaja Derbar Raja
• Intentions of PRC

~~

The Chinese public is venting its spleen online over inaccurate reports about the Tibet riot by some Western media groups.

Since March 20, various inaccurate photos that claimed to be of the Lhasa riot on March 14 by Western media were collected and uploaded on the Internet by some Chinese overseas students.

The collection comprised 11 pictures and footage broadcast by Cable News Network (CNN), the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and other foreign media where netizens highlighted the mistaken captions accompanying the images.

A picture on CNN’s website showed people running in front of a military truck. In the original picture, mobsters throwing stones at the truck were cropped out by the U.S.-based network.

On the BBC website, a picture showing Chinese Armed Police officers helping medical staff move a wounded person into an ambulance was captioned “there is a heavy military presence in Lhasa”.

The obvious references of First Aid and Red Cross signs on the ambulance were dutifully neglected.

Fox TV, the Washington Post, Berliner Morningpost and other Western media were also singled-out in the collection.

After the images were released, netizens also started a signature collection campaign on www.china.com. So far, tens of thousands of signatures have been collected.

Most of the postings on the forum indicated the Western media had favored the rioters.

Rao Jin, a Tsinghua University graduate, publicized the website www.anti-cnn.com to display the picture and snapshots. “CNN is just one example of the Western media. What stands behind the distortion is misunderstanding and bias toward China,” he said.

One of the biggest Chinese websites www.sina.com opened a special link to talk about the Western media distortion of the Lhasa riot, a discussion that drew millions of participants.

To date, the German-based RTL TV and N-TV had made corrections on their website on March 23 and 24, respectively, and apologized to the public.

The Washington Post publicized an editor’s note on March 24, saying the caption for an earlier version of a slideshow on the Tibet riot was incorrectly associated with a photo from Nepal where Nepalese uniformed police dispel Tibetans. The caption on the new version was corrected.

On the www.anti-cnn.com, netizens continued to pressure Western media, including CNN and BBC, to apologize to their Chinese audience.

A Chinese who immigrated to Canada posted a video clip on youtube.com entitled “Tibet was, is and will always be a part of China”.

The producer, using the Internet name of Huang Jinshao, said he had received more than 500 e-mails of support within four hours of the posting. The clip had been viewed nearly 1.2 million times in three days.

“I want Chinese people’s voice to be heard,” the man said.

Source from China Tibet Information Centre